Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Solving PISA Problems Based on Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Styles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 15, 2025
https://doi.org/10.55677/ijhrsss/02-2025-Vol02I1
Download
pdf
Statistic
Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): Volume 02 Issue 01 January 2025

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rezqy Ayu Devi Arafah
Universitas Bakti Indonesia, Banyuwangi, Indonesia
Isnainiwati
Universitas Bakti Indonesia, Banyuwangi, Indonesia
Hartatik
Universitas Jember, Indonesia
Bachtiar Tri Mulyawan
SMPN 3 Rogojampi, Banyuwangi, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to describe students' critical thinking skills based on students' cognitive styles, namely field dependent (FD) and field independent (FI). The research subjects consisted of 4 students of class VIII-B of SMP Negeri 4 Jember which consisted of 2 FD students and 2 FI students. The data collection technique in this research is a test technique in the form of a GEFT test to measure students' cognitive style and a student's critical thinking ability test in the form of PISA questions with Quantity and Space and Shape content and non-test techniques in the form of interviews. The results showed that (1) subjek FD only capable on ability 4; (2) subjek FI capable on all ability of critical thinking according to (Ennis, 2011); This study suggests teachers to familiarize FD and FI students to develop observational skills and provide various information about definitions or understandings in a given material so that students are able to use correct evidence and be able to act by providing further explanations.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rezqy Ayu Devi Arafah, Isnainiwati, Hartatik, & Bachtiar Tri Mulyawan. (2025). Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Solving PISA Problems Based on Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Styles. International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies, 2(01), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijhrsss/02-2025-Vol02I1

References

  1. Arafah, R. A. D., Kurniati, D., Lestari, N. D. S., Pambudi, D. S., & Yuliati, N. (2023). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Model Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Analyticity Siswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3).
  2. Bailey, J. (2022). Learning to Teach Mathematics Through Problem Solving. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-022-00249-0
  3. Busyairi, A., Harjono, A., & Zuhdi, M. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Prospective Physics Teachers ’ Learning Achievement in Terms of Cognitive Style ( Field Dependent and Field Independent ). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika DanTeknologi (JPFT), 8(1).
  4. Chairunnisak. (2020). Implementasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 Di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pendidikan Pascasarjana UNIMED, 351–359.
  5. Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical Thinking Skill Development: Analysis of a New Learning Management Model for Thai High Schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3
  6. Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. University of Illinois. University of Illinois.
  7. Fatmawati, H., Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2014). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Polya pada Pokok Bahasan Persamaan Kuadrat. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(9), 899–910.
  8. Gómez, R. L., & Suárez, A. M. (2020). Do inquiry-based teaching and school climate influence science achievement and critical thinking ? Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(43).
  9. Katoningsih, S., & Sunaryo, I. (2020). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) as Reading Literacy Standard: Critical Thinking is Priority. Education Sustainability & Society (ESS), 8(10).
  10. Khairat, F., & Fauzan, A. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Peserta didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Padang Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 2(2), 18–24. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/pmat/article/download/6219/3130
  11. Kholid, M. N., Hamida, P. S., Pradana, L. N., & Maharani, S. (2020). Students’ Critical Thinking Depends on Their Cognitive Style. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(1).
  12. Kurniati, D., & As’ari, A. R. (2021). Disposisi Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Duta Media Publishing.
  13. Lwande, C., Muchemi, L., & Oboko, R. (2021). Identifying Learning Styles and Cognitive Traits in a Learning Management System. Heliyon, 7(8), e07701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07701
  14. Mohammadi, T., & Amjadiparvar, A. (2022). The Contributions of Input Enhancement of Collocations to the Reading The Contributions of Input Enhancement of Collocations to the Reading Comprehension of Iranian Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Learners. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 10(1), 53–75.
  15. https://doi.org/10.30486/RELP.2021.1927845.1262
  16. Ngilawajan. (2013). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Materi Turunan Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. PEDAGOGIA, 6(2), 71–83.
  17. Nisa, N. A., Prayitno, S., Hikmah, N., & ... (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Pokok Bahasan Aritmatika Sosial Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Journal of Classroom …, 6(1). Retrieved from https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jcar/article/view/5968%0Ahttps://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jcar/article/download/5968/4549
  18. Nurmayani. (2020). The Analysis of Students ’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability through Discovery Learning Models. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(11), 233–241.
  19. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result in Focus. OECD 2016.
  20. Polat, M. (2022). Reliability Analysis of PISA 2018 Reading Literacy Student Questionnaire based on Item Response Theory (IRT): Turkey Sample, 14(1), 1004–1028.
  21. Pulkkinen, J., & Rautopuro, J. (2022). The Correspondence Between PISA Performance and School Achievement in Finland. International Journal of Educational Research, 114(May), 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102000
  22. Putri, S., Husna, A., & Agustyaningrum, N. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Barisan dan Deret Berdasarkan Teori Newman ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.506
  23. R Nisa’. (2016). Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Ditinjau Dari Gaya kognitif Dan Kemampuan Matematika. Jurnal Apotema, 2(1), 66–76.
  24. Rani, F. N., Napitupulu, E., & Hasratuddin. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Smp Melalui Pendekatan Realistic Mathematic Education. PARADIKMA JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA, 11(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.36654/educatif.v2i3.178
  25. Rifqiyana, L. (2015). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dengan Pembelajaran Model 4K Materi Geometri Kelas Viii Ditinjau Dari Gaya, 1–377.
  26. Satiti, W. S., & Wulandari, K. (2021). Students’ Ability To Think Mathematically in Solving PISA Mathematics Problems Content Change and Relationship. Mathematics Education Journals, 5(1), 2579–5260. Retrieved from http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/MEJ
  27. Setiawan, A., Degeng, I. N. S., Sa’dijah, C., & Praherdhiono, H. (2020). The Effect of Collaborative Problem-Solving Strategies and Cognitive Style on Students’ Problem-Solving Abilities. Journal for Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4).
  28. Sholahuddin, A., Susilowati, E., Prahani, B. K., & Erman, E. (2021). Using a Cognitive Style-Based Learning Strategy to Improve Students’ Environmental Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Intruction, 14(4).
  29. Silma, U., Sujadi, I., & Nurhasanah, F. (2019). Analysis of Students’ Cognitive Style in Learning Mathematics from Three Different Frameworks. In AIP Conference Proceedings.
  30. Sima, M. E., Jamiah, Y., & Yusmin, E. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Frisco Dalam Materi Fungsi Di Kelas Viii. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 11(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v11i5.54464
  31. Surur, M., Degeng, I. N. S., Setyosari, P., & Kuswandi, D. (2020). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Strategies and Cognitive Styles on, 13(4), 35–48.
  32. Syafiti, W. U., Budayasa, I. K., & Masriyah, M. (2022). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent (FI) dan Field Dependent (FD). Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 3704–3711. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2793
  33. Ulya, H. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika SMP Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Universitas Negeri Semerang.
  34. Vendiagrys, L., Junaedi, I., & Masrukan. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Soal Setipe TIMSS Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Model Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Matematika, 34–41.
  35. Yuliana, Y., Waluyo, E., & Halqi, M. (2021). Penerapan Metode Pemecahan Masalah terhadap Konsepsi Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Elementary School (JOES), 4(2), 166–178.
  36. https://doi.org/10.31539/joes.v4i2.3028