International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

Governance quality is increasingly recognised as the decisive factor shaping the sustainability of natural resource management (NRM) in developing countries. This manuscript critically examines how governance gaps manifested through institutional fragmentation, weak enforcement, corruption, limited participation, and policy incoherence undermine the sustainable use of natural resources. Employing a desk-based qualitative design, the study synthesised over one hundred peer-reviewed publications and institutional reports (2015–2025) using systematic search procedures and thematic content analysis. Findings reveal that NRM failures are systemic and interdependent: fragmented institutions erode coordination, integrity deficits weaken legitimacy, and inadequate participation limits compliance. The review identifies polycentric governance and policy coherence for sustainable development (PCSD) as complementary frameworks capable of bridging these governance gaps. It concludes that sustainable NRM requires holistic reform integrating institutional capacity, transparency, and inclusive co-management anchored in both national coordination and local autonomy. The study contributes to scholarship and policy by proposing a hybrid governance model that aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 13, 15 and 16) and offers a pragmatic pathway towards environmental resilience and socio-economic equity in developing contexts.

Governance gaps, Natural resource management, Developing countries, Policy coherence, Polycentric governance, Sustainable Development Goals

1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. Penguin Press.
2. Adam, J. N., Adams, T., Gerber, J. D., & Haller, T. (2021). Decentralization for increased sustainability in natural resource management? Two cautionary cases from Ghana. Sustainability, 13(12), 6885.
3. Afolabi, J. A. (2023). Natural resource rent and environmental quality nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa: assessing the role of regulatory quality. Resources Policy, 82, 103488.
4. African Development Bank. (2023). African economic outlook 2023: Mobilizing private sector financing for climate and green growth. African Development Bank Group. https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/african-economic-outlook-2023
5. Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
6. Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2021). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
7. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., & Hill, R. (2021). Governance for the conservation of nature. Conservation Letters, 14(3), e12865. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12865
8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
9. Browne, K., Dzebo, A., Iacobuta, G., Faus Onbargi, A., Shawoo, Z., Dombrowsky, I., ... & Persson, Å. (2023). How does policy coherence shape effectiveness and inequality? Implications for sustainable development and the 2030 Agenda. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3161-3174.
10. Chitsove, E., & Madebwe, T. (2024). Community based natural resources management in Botswana.Journal of African Law, 68(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855323000293
11. Clegg, S., & Ninan, J. (2023). Unravelling governmentality in project ecologies. Project Leadership and Society, 4, 100099.
12. Cotler, H., Cuevas, M. L., Landa, R., & Frausto, J. M. (2022). Environmental governance in urban watersheds: the role of civil society organizations in Mexico.  Sustainability, 14(2), 988.
13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
14. Fariss, B., DeMello, N., Powlen, K. A., Latimer, C.E., Masuda, Y.J., & Kennedy, C.M. (2023). Catalyzing success in community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 37(1), e13973. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13973
15. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
16. Jansen, L. J., & Kalas, P. P. (2023). Improving governance of tenure in policy and practice: agrarian and environmental transition in the Mekong region and its impacts on sustainability analyzed through the ‘tenure-scape’approach. Sustainability, 15(3), 1773.
17. Jimu, T. (2025). Analysing informal governance arrangements in small-scale fisheries: A case study of Norton, Zimbabwe. International Journal of the Commons, 19(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1401
18. Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2024). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and 2024 update. Available at SSRN 5154675.
19. Kellner, E., Petrovics, D., & Huitema, D. (2024). Polycentric climate governance: The state, local action, democratic preferences, and power – Emerging insights and a research agenda. Global Environmental Politics, 24(3), 24-47.https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00753
20. Kimengsi, J. N., Grabek, J., Giessen, L., Balgah, R. A., & Buchenrieder, G. (2022). Forest management institutions and actor-centered conflicts in sub-Saharan Africa: contemporary realities and future avenues for research and policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 144, 102846.
21. Luaba, K. (2021). Collaborative natural resource governance for biodiversity and livelihoods around protected areas: a dual case study of Kaingu and Kaindu, Zambia (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).
22. Macheka, M. T. (2021). Environmental management and practises in Zimbabwe’s Chivi district: A political ecology analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), 2000569.
23. Meadowcroft, J. (2022). The socialism of the rich: Egalitarianism, wealth, and privilege in academic philosophy. Social Philosophy and Policy, 39(2), 169-187.
24. Msezane, N. N. (2023). The outlook on the extractives upstream investment in South Africa: the environmental governance issue.
25. OECD. (2023). Driving policy coherence for sustainable development. OECD Publishing.
26. OECD. (2024). Unleashing policy coherence to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. OECD Publishing.
27. Ongo Nkoa, B. E., Song, J. S., & Minkoué Bikoula, B. (2024). Natural resource rents in developing countries: Is the positive influence on fragilities real? Resources Policy, 89, 104541.
28. Ostrom, E. 2010. "Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems." American Economic Review 100 (3): 641–72. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
29. Ostrom, E.(1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Pres.
30. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
31. Piazza, A. (2021). Collective responsibility in the cooperative governance of climate change. Sustainability, 13(8), 4363.
32. Pirani, S. (2024). Navigating research ethics: Strategies for preventing and addressing research misconduct. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Reviews, 3(02), 96-104.
33. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. IDEAS/RePEc+2SCIRP+2 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
34. Tobin, P., Huitema, D., & Kellner, E. (2024). The Empirical Realities of Polycentric Climate Governance: Introduction to the Special Issue. Global Environmental Politics, 24(3), 1-23.
35. Transparency International. (2025). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024: Global report. Transparency International.
36. United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Human development report 2023/2024:
37. United Nations Environment Programme. (2023, February 6). Annual report 2022. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/resources/annual-report-2022
38. Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. (2019). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376
39. World Bank. (2023). Worldwide Governance Indicators: Documentation and methodology. Washington, DC: World Bank.
40. Yu, Y. (2023). Role of Natural resources rent on economic growth: fresh empirical insight from selected developing economies. Resources Policy, 81, 103326.