International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

The influence of students’ language communication skills and fluency on their reading and understanding towards their learning has been an interesting focus of many researchers these days. It affects students’ academic achievement scores and their motivation development towards instructional process in all stages of their academic straggle and progress in life which has continue to be a major concern to many researchers both social and experimental scientists alike. It plays significant role to the general success and total development of the learner even at their advancement to the next level in their academic growth. The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to examine the effect of using EdrawMax-based concept mapping approach as a mediation strategy on the development of students’ verbal communication ability and fluency for enhancing their motivation and performance in biology. A total number of One hundred and twenty students from two dissimilar mixed Senior High Schools in Ashanti Region of Ghana were selected for the study. Three instruments, namely students’ verbal ability test items and motivation questionnaire as well as students’ performance test were used for the data collection and the results were analyzed using One-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation and multiple regression analysis of SPSS version 21. The outcomes of the study shown that effective regular use of EdrawMax-based concept mapping teaching and learning approach has a strong and positive effect on students’ verbal ability and fluency development which improves their inducement of motivation to learn the concepts of photosynthesis and thus enhances their performance in biology.

Concept mapping; verbal ability; academic performance; intrinsic motivation; extrinsic motivation

1. Adejimi, S. A., Nzabalirwa, W., & Shivoga, W. A. (2022). Enhancing students’ attitudes toward biology using consensus and cooperative reflective journal writing educational strategies. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 80(2), 242-255. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.242 
2. Ahmad, M. & Marzieh, P. T. (2012). The Impact of Teacher Self-efficacy on the Students’ 
3. Motivation and Achievement. Theory and Practicein Language Studies, Vol. 2,No. 3, pp. 483-491, 
4. Ajaja, O. P. (2011). Concept mapping as a study skill: Effects on Students Achievement in Biology; International Journal Education Science, 3(1): 49-57. 
5. Ameyaw Y, & Okyer, M. (2018). The efficacy of some teaching and learning instructions that enhance students’ performance in Excretion. Ann Resear, 1(5): 555571 
6. Ameyaw, Y. (2012). Closeness index an assessment tool for student’s performance of cell theory. International Journal of Science and Nature. Vol.3 (3)2012; 532-537 
7. Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Makinga difference:Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman 
8. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Journal of 
9. Applied Psychology: An international Review, 51, 269-290 
10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsicmotivation and self-determination in humanbehaviour. New York: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 
11. Goldberg, M. D. & Cornell, D. G. (1998). The influence of motivation and self-concept on academic achievement in second and third-grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21(2), 179-205. 
12. Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of EducationalResearch, 86, 247-253. 
13. Moran, M. & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. New York: Cambridge University press. 
14. Novak, J.D., & Gowin, R. (1984). Learninghow to learn (3rd Edition).
15. Odiaka, S. I. (2002). Effects of holistic and subskill instructional approaches and content area reading comprehension among some junior secondary school students in Ibadan metropolis. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Ibadan. 
16. Okere, M. C. (2019). Students-led discussion learning strategies, verbal ability, and students’ attitude to literature-in-
17. English. Transatlantic Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3353725 
18. Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002), Motivationin education: Theory, research and applications (2nd Ed). Columbus, OH: Merrill-Prentice Hall 
19. Podell, D. & Soodak, L. (1993). Teacher efficacy and bias in special education referrals. 
20. Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chuda, J. (2007). Slovakian students’ attitudes toward biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 287–295. 
21. Roth, W. R. & Roychoudhury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education, 76(5), 531-557. 
22. Rudasill, K. M., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Justice, L. M., & Pence, K. (2006). Temperament and language skills as predictors of teacher-child relationship quality in preschool. Early Education and Development, 17(2), 271–291. 
23. Solmaz, A.(2016) An Analysis of the Relationship between High School Students' Self- efficacy, Metacognitive Strategy Use and their Academic Motivation for 
24. Learn Biology, Journal of Education and TrainingStudies, Vol. 4, No. 2; pg.5 
25. Stansbury, K., & Zimmermann, L. K. (1999). Relations among child language skills, maternal socialization of emotion regulation, and child behaviour problems. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 30(2), 121–142. 
26. Teaching and TeacherEducation, 17, 783-805. 
27. Tournaki, N., & Podell, D. (2005). The impact of student characteristics and teacher efficacy on teachers’ predictions of student success. Teaching and Teacher Education 21, 299– 314 
28. Tschannen-Moran, M. & Woolfolk Hoy, A. & Hoy, W. K. (1998) Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure, Review of EducationalResearch, 68, 202-248. 
29. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. 
30. Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 181-193. 
31. Xingeng, D., & Jianxiang, L. (2012). Advantages and disadvantages of PowerPoint in lectures to science students. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 2(9), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2012.09.10