International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

This study explored teachers’ experiences in implementing the MATATAG Araling Panlipunan 7 curriculum in Philippine Social Studies, focusing on curriculum goals and objectives, content and structure, instructional coherence, assessment alignment, responsiveness to learners, and the opportunities and challenges encountered during implementation. A qualitative descriptive research design was employed because it enabled an in-depth examination of teachers’ experiences and perspectives within actual school contexts without making causal claims about curriculum effectiveness. The study was conducted during School Year 2024–2026 in ten selected public secondary schools under the Schools Division Office of Ilocos Sur, Philippines, comprising six Mega Schools and four Large Schools. Purposive sampling was used to select 26 Araling Panlipunan 7 teachers with direct experience implementing the MATATAG Curriculum. Three teachers were selected from each Mega School and two from each Large School. Data were gathered through researcher-made semi-structured interviews covering participants’ profiles, perceptions, challenges, and coping mechanisms related to curriculum implementation. Interviews were conducted face-to-face or through Zoom following informed consent, audiorecorded, transcribed, and anonymized. Thematic analysis involved repeated transcript review, initial coding, categorization, pattern identification, and theme development. Teachers generally experienced MATATAG Araling Panlipunan 7 as more focused, coherent, relevant, and manageable than the previous curriculum. They particularly valued its clear objectives, streamlined content, logical progression, and alignment between competencies and assessment. Teachers also reported that localized activities and connections to learners’ lived experiences supported academic, personal, cultural, social, and civic development. However, implementation challenges included limited learning resources and references, technological demands, competing school responsibilities, and the need for additional knowledge and professional support. MATATAG Araling Panlipunan 7 was generally experienced as a positive and meaningful curriculum reform that promotes focused, coherent, contextualized, and competency-oriented learning. However, teachers’ experiences indicate that curriculum clarity alone does not ensure confident and effective implementation; adequate resources, professional learning, technological assistance, and institutional support remain important conditions for translating curriculum intentions into classroom practice.

MATATAG Curriculum, Grade 7 Social Studies (Araling Panlipunan), Teacher’s experiences, Curriculum Implementation

1. Aguas, P. (2020).Key stakeholders’ lived experiences while implementing an aligned curriculum: a phenomenological study. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.3924 
2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. http://bvbr.bibbvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number =009385460&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS& service_type=MEDIA 
3. Banks, J. A.  (2015). Cultural Diversity and                Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622255 
4. Bauer, J. F., & Kenton, J. M. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ723724 
5. Bejasa, R. C. (2026). Lived experiences of the Public-School teachers in the implementation of Matatag curriculum. Journals Press. https://journalspress.com/lived-experiencesof-the-public-school-teachers-in-the-implementation-of-matatag-curriculum/
6. Bentayao, G. J., Cagape, W., & Quibod, C. P. G. (2024). SCHOOL HEAD’S MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON POLICY CHANGES IN DAVAO CITY: MATATAG CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION IN FOCUS. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics Commerce and Educational Management, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra18886 
7. Bernardo, A. B. I., & Mante-Estacio, M. J. (2023). Metacognitive reading strategies and its relationship with Filipino high school students’ reading proficiency: insights from the PISA 2018 data. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01886-6 
8. Bloom, B. S., Krathwohl, D. R., & Masia, B. B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The classification of educational goals. In Medical Entomology and Zoology. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA66374876
9. Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 12(24),               10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367 
10. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311 
11. Department of Education. (2023). Research about MATATAG Curriculum for M.A. subject. [Research document]. Retrieved from educational archives. 
12. Department of Education. (2024). Annual report on the effectiveness and impact of the MATATAG Araling Panlipunan 7 curriculum. Department of Education, Philippines. 
13. Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764 
14. Estrellado, C. J. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum: Why Curriculum [must] Change? Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0001 
15. García, E., & Weiss, E. (2020, September 10). COVID-19 and Student Performance, Equity, and U.S. Education Policy: Lessons from Pre-Pandemic Research to Inform Relief, Recovery, and Rebuilding. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610971.pdf 
16. Gimbel, E. (2023, July 19). Here’s how modern teachers boost their ed tech skills. Technology Solutions That Drive Education. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2023/07/heres-how-modern-teachers-boosttheir-ed-tech-skills
17. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., . . . Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 
18. Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. In Issue Lab (Candid). https://issuelab.org/permalink/resource/9740 
19. Malapira, D. J. L. (2026). Post-War and Pre-Migration experiences of mid-1940s Ilokano Sakadas bound for Hawaii. International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies., 03(06). https://doi.org/10.55677/ijhrsss/13-2026-vol03i06 
20. Olipas, C. N. P. (2024). A qualitative exploration of the MATATAG curriculum’s perceived impact on history and geography education in the school year 2024-2025. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences,2(1), 526–531. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(1).45
21. Saro, J. M., Montejo, C. B., Sucong, J. A., Bustamante, M. F. O., & Perez, J. B. (2024). A 663 qualitative exploration on the perceived impact of the MATATAG curriculum on basic education teaching in the school year 2024-2025. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.4.3134
22. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction,4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
23. Tolentino, D. P., Eting, A. M. S., Bonifacio, V. J. M., & Lesmis, A. J. L. (2025). Navigating 671 Challenges: Social Studies Teachers’ Perspectives on the MATATAG curriculum. 672 Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(10), 1459–1476.https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i102584
24. Torrefiel, J., Cagape, E., Galan, O., Doydora, V., & Pintac, T. (2025). Teachers’ Lived 675 Experiences in the Transition to the MATATAG Curriculum: A Phenomenological 676 Inquiry into Adaptation, Challenges, and Growth. Journal of Interdisciplinary 677 Perspectives, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.041
25. UNESCO IIEP Learning Portal.(2024). Teacher motivation and learning outcomes. https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/improve-learning/teacher680 motivation-and-learning-outcomes
26. Weissberg, R. P. (2019). Promoting the social and emotional learning of millions of school children. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618817756