International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

The 2018 General Education Curriculum in Vietnam requires physics teaching to develop students’ scientific competence, and the science, technology, society and environment (STSE) model has been proposed as one way to meet this requirement. Evidence on how upper secondary physics teachers currently teach specific topics in relation to STSE remains limited. This study surveyed 55 physics teachers about the topic “Electric current and circuits” (Physics 11). A 15-item questionnaire on a five-point Likert scale covered four areas: teaching practice, STSE integration, teacher-rated student scientific competence, and awareness of and readiness for the STSE model. Descriptive statistics and internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω) were computed. Lecturing combined with problem solving was reported by 61.8% of teachers, whereas 38.9% had implemented project-based learning for the topic, and 72.2% reported time and facility constraints. Teachers more often linked the topic to social issues (87.3%) and environmental issues (76.4%) than to modern technology (59.3%). Collecting and processing data was the lowest-rated student capability (M = 3.18). Although 40.7% of teachers were familiar with the STSE model, 70.4% were willing to adopt it if given materials and training. The findings indicate a gap between awareness and readiness, and point to the need for topic-specific STSE resources, professional development, and low-cost technological projects.

STSE, physics teachers, electric current and circuits, scientific competence, teacher readiness, Vietnam

1. Aikenhead, G. S. (2005). Research into STS science education. Educación Química, 16(3), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2005.3.66101
2. Chen, C.-H., & Yang, Y.-C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
3. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
4. Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1614813
5. Hà, V. D., & Bùi, T. T. N. (2024). Thực trạng tích hợp giáo dục vì sự phát triển bền vững trong dạy học tại một số trường trung học phổ thông ở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh [The current state of integrating education for sustainable development in teaching at some upper secondary schools in Ho Chi Minh City]. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 24(Special issue 2), 264–270. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/1730
6. Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
7. Lê, K. Q. (2025a). Dạy học chủ đề “Nguồn điện” (Vật lí 11) theo hướng tích hợp gắn với giáo dục bảo vệ môi trường cho học sinh [Teaching the topic “Power sources” (Physics 11) through an integrated approach linked to environmental protection education]. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 25(Special issue 1), 181–186. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/3140
8. Lê, K. Q. (2025b). Tổ chức dạy học chủ đề “Năng lượng. Sự bảo toàn và chuyển hóa năng lượng” (Vật lí 10) theo mô hình STSE nhằm bồi dưỡng năng lực giải quyết vấn đề cho học sinh [Organising the teaching of the topic “Energy: Conservation and transformation” (Physics 10) following the STSE model to foster students’ problem-solving competence]. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 25(21), 30–35. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/4387
9. Lê, K. Q., Nguyễn, T. T. H., Nguyễn, T. L. N., Lã, P. T., & Đinh, V. D. (2026). Thực trạng dạy học theo mô hình STSE ở một số trường trung học cơ sở tại Việt Nam [Teaching natural science through the STSE model in lower secondary schools: Current practices and proposed solutions]. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 26(Special issue 8), 40–48. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/6262
10. Nguyễn, D. L., Đỗ, H. T., & Tưởng, D. H. (2023). Tổ chức dạy học theo mô hình STSE nhằm bồi dưỡng năng lực giải quyết vấn đề của phát triển bền vững ở học sinh [Organising STSE-based teaching to foster students’ problem-solving competence for sustainable development]. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 23(Special issue 5), 79–85. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/1947
11. Nguyen, Q. L., Cao, T. K., Tran, Q. H., & Nguyen, T. N. (2025). Developing students’ scientific competence through the STSE model: An active learning intervention. Discover Education, 4, Article 363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00766-2
12. Nguyen, Q. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, Q. H. (2026). Enhancing 8th grade students’ environmental science competency through science, technology, society, and environment-oriented teaching: An experimental study. Discover Education, 5, Article 239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01279-2
13. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
14. Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20435
15. Ramnarain, U. D. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 65–75. https://pure.uj.ac.za/en/publications/teachers-perceptions-of-inquiry-based-learning-in-urban-suburban-/
16. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
17. Xiang, J., & Han, C. (2024). Effect of STSE approach on high school students’ understanding of nature of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10053-0