International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

The increasing use of online shopping and social media has contributed to a rise in impulsive buying behaviour among teenagers, with peer influence playing a significant role in shaping purchasing decisions. This study examined the relationship between peer influence and impulsive buying behaviour among Maldivian teenagers and determined whether peer influence significantly predicts impulsive buying behaviour. A quantitative cross-sectional research design was employed, and data were collected from 255 teenagers using a structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, and simple linear regression. The findings revealed a significant moderate positive relationship between peer influence and impulsive buying behaviour (r = 0.523, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that peer influence significantly predicted impulsive buying behaviour (β = 0.523, p < 0.001), explaining 27.4% of the variance (R² = 0.274). These results indicate that teenagers who experience greater peer influence are more likely to make spontaneous and unplanned purchasing decisions. The findings support the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R) Theory and contribute to the limited literature on adolescent consumer behaviour in the Maldives. The study highlights the importance of promoting financial literacy and awareness of peer influence to encourage responsible purchasing behaviour among teenagers.

Peer influence, impulsive buying, Teenagers

1. Abdelsalam, S., Salim, N., Alias, R. A., Husain, O., Salih, S. H., Thurasamy, R., ... & Shehzad, H. M. F. (2024). Using theory integration to explain online impulse buying behavior in social commerce. IEEE Access, 12, 32033–32052. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3363024 
2. Adri, E. V., Setiawan, D., & Methindo, O. (2021). Relationship of conformity with adolescent impulsion buying behavior on fashion products in marketplace with self-control as a moderating variable. TAZKIYA: Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 133–143. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v9i2.22523 
3. Alawiah, R., & Hayu, R. S. (2025). Buy now or be left behind! How does social media marketing, celebrity endorsement, peer pressure, and testimonial affect online impulse buying behaviour? Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Perbankan, 11(2), 209– 226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35384/jemp.v11i2.746 
4. Aragoncillo, L., & Orus, C. (2018). Impulse buying behaviour: An online-offline comparative and the impact of social media. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 22(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2018-007 
5. Bandil, D. D. (2025). Exploring a structured influence framework of impulsive buying behavior among teenagers in the fastfashion sector. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S9), 2081–2086.
6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
7. Kathuria, A., & Bakshi, A. (2024). Influence of promotional factors on online impulse buying: Exploring the mediating role of impulse buying tendency. Current Psychology, 43(44), 34035–34051.
8. Liu, H., De Costa, M. F. S. D. C. B. M. F., Yasin, M. A. L. B., & Ruan, Q. (2025). A study on how social media influences on impulsive buying. Expert Systems, 42(1), e13448. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13448 
9. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.
10. Nguyen, K. M., Nguyen, N. T., Vo, L. H. Y., Kieu, T. M., & Cao, P. V. U. (2025). Peer influence, impulse buying, and consumer emotional attachment: The impact of social media stalking and psychological nuances. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2025, Article 3406183. https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/3406183  
11. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. 
12. Panasea, I. G. N. O. (2024). The effect of fashion involvement, peer pressure, and self-esteem on compulsive buying: Study on Generation Z as consumers of H&M stores in Badung Regency, Bali. American Journal of Economic and Management Business (AJEMB), 3(8), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.58631/ajemb.v3i8.103  
13. Pham, A. D., Nguyen, H. N., Le, T. T., Nguyen, H. K., Khuat, H. T., Phan, H. T., & Vu, H. T. (2026). Young consumers’ impulse buying tendency on social media: An empirical analysis in Vietnam in light of the LST theoretical perspective. Young Consumers, 27(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2023-1785  
14. Rhesa, M., Ichsan, I., & Firmansyah, M. R. (2023). The relationship between conformity and impulsive buying in adolescents in Makassar City. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 5(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v5i1.619  
15. Rozman, A., & Hashim, H. M. (2023). Impact of peer influence and personality traits on impulsive buying behaviour among Malaysian university students. Researchers World, 14(1), 1–14.   
16. Singh, P., Sharma, B. K., Arora, L., & Bhatt, V. (2023). Measuring social media impact on impulse buying behavior. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2262371. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2262371  
17. Tabassum, A., & Nabi, M. K. (2022). Online advertisement and its influence on teenagers' buying behaviour: An empirical study. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 24(6), 7–18. DOI: 10.9790/487X-2406050718   
18. Thürmer, J. L., Bieleke, M., Wieber, F., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2020). If-then plans help regulate automatic peer influence on impulse buying. European Journal of Marketing, 54(9), 2079–2105. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-05-2018-0341  
19. Wibowo, A., Chen, S.-C., Wiangin, U., Ma, Y., & Ruangkanjanases, A. (2020). Customer behavior as an outcome of social media marketing: The role of social media marketing activity and customer experience. Sustainability, 13(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010189  
20. Zafar, H., Siddiqui, F. A., & Anjum, M. A. (2025). The role of social media influencers in shaping consumer brand engagement and its impact on strategic business decisions. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 538–551.