Techno-Conference and Parenting Stress: Moderating and Mediating Effects of Working-From-Home, Responsiveness, and Marital Satisfaction

Author's Information:

Prof. Jemima N. A. A. Lomotey, PhD

Dean, Counselling and Psychology, Rudolph Kwanue University, Monrovia, Liberia

Vol 03 No 11 (2026):Volume 03 Issue 11 November 2026

Page No.: 1040-1053

Abstract:

The proliferation of digital technology in the domestic sphere has introduced "technoference"—the interruption and interference of technology use in interpersonal interactions—as a significant concern for family wellbeing. This quantitative study examines the relationship between technoference and parenting stress among Gen Z parents in Ghana, investigating the mediating roles of parental responsiveness and marital satisfaction, and the moderating role of work-from-home (WFH) arrangements. Using a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 420 parents (aged 22-35 years) through stratified random sampling across five regions in Ghana. Validated instruments measured technoference (Technoference Scale), parenting stress (Parenting Stress Index-Short Form), parental responsiveness (Responsiveness subscale of the Parenting Dimensions Inventory), marital satisfaction (Couples Satisfaction Index), and WFH status. Mediation analysis using PROCESS Macro (Model 4) with 5,000 bootstrap resamples revealed that technoference was positively associated with parenting stress (β = 0.34, p < .001). This relationship was partially mediated by parental responsiveness (indirect effect β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.07, 0.16]) and marital satisfaction (indirect effect β = 0.09, 95% CI [0.05, 0.13]). The serial mediation through responsiveness → marital satisfaction was also significant (indirect effect β = 0.06, 95% CI [0.03, 0.09]). Moderation analysis (PROCESS Model 1) revealed that WFH arrangements significantly moderated the technoference-parenting stress relationship (interaction β = 0.19, p = .002), with the association being stronger for parents working from home compared to those working outside the home. The findings extend the Technoference Framework and the Family Stress Model, providing culturally grounded insights for interventions targeting technology use in the domestic sphere. Implications for workplace policies, parenting programmes, and family therapy are discussed.

KeyWords:

Technoference, parenting stress, work-from-home, parental responsiveness, marital satisfaction, Gen Z, Ghana, family technology, digital distraction

References:

  1. Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting Stress Index (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
  2. Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 567-595.
  3. Awuviry-Newton, K., Nkansah, J. O., & Ofori-Dua, K. (2020). Social support networks among older adults in rural and urban Ghana. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 35(3), 245-262.
  4. Badasu, D. M. (2017). Parenting stress and coping strategies among Ghanaian parents. Ghana Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 112-128.
  5. Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 1-103.
  6. Calvano, C., Engelke, L., Di Bella, J., Kindermann, J., Renneberg, B., & Winter, S. M. (2021). Families in the COVID-19 pandemic: Parental stress, parent mental health and children's adjustment. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 53(1), 134-148.
  7. Carlson, C. L., Mayfield, J. R., & Anderson, J. R. (2018). Marital satisfaction and parenting stress: Examining the mediating role of partner support. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(4), 512-522.
  8. Chen, J., & Clark, A. (2019). Marital satisfaction and parenting stress in collectivist contexts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(5), 634-651.
  9. Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175-199.
  10. Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2000). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 179-193.
  11. Deater-Deckard, K. (2004). Parenting stress. Yale University Press.
  12. Dumas, J. E., Nissley-Tsiopinis, J., & Moreland, A. D. (2005). From parenting stress to parenting behavior: The role of responsive parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 296-305.
  13. Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 108-132.
  14. Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(4), 797-809.
  15. Frick, P. J., Lahey, B. B., & Waldman, I. D. (2017). Parental responsiveness and parenting stress: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(4), 412-422.
  16. Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233-239.
  17. Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572-583.
  18. Gyekye, K. (1996). African cultural values: An introduction. Sankofa Publishing.
  19. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  20. Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 143-148.
  21. Lian, S., Sun, X., & Yang, Z. (2020). Social media use and parenting stress among Chinese mothers: The mediating role of social comparison. Journal of Affective Disorders, 274, 543-550.
  22. Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-101). Wiley.
  23. Masarik, A. S., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Stress and child development: A review of the Family Stress Model. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 85-90.
  24. McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). Technology interference in parent-child and romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 274-282.
  25. McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018a). Technoference: Longitudinal associations between parent technology use and child externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Pediatric Research, 84(4), 533-541.