International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

This study examined errors in English language compositions of Junior High School (JHS) two (2) students in the Effutu Municipality and explored teachers’ perspectives on the causes and solutions to these errors. The study was grounded in the positivist research paradigm, which is a research framework assuming a single, measurable reality where objective truths can be discovered through quantitative methods. A quantitative approach was employed in the study. This study employed a descriptive survey design to explore the types and frequency of errors in student essays within the Effutu Municipality. Using a multi sampling technique, 210 students and six English teachers were selected. Errors in student essays were categorised into mechanical, grammatical, and lexical types, and analysed using frequency counts and percentages. Findings revealed that mechanical errors were most prevalent, accounting for 67.1% of all errors, with spelling (25.3%), capitalization (21.1%), and punctuation (20.7%) being the most common. Grammatical errors represented 25.1%, particularly tense (13.6%) and subject–verb agreement errors, while lexical errors were least frequent (7.8%). Female students (54.7%) made more severe errors than males (45.3%), especially in tense, spelling, and punctuation. Age was also a factor: students aged 12–15 (56%) produced more moderate to severe errors compared with those aged 16 and above (30%) and those aged 9–11 (14%). Teachers attributed these errors to interlanguage and intra-language interference, limited reading exposure, and variations in parental educational background. Suggested solutions included peer modelling, peer tutoring, guided writing, and the use of interactive teaching and learning resources. The study recommends integrating peer review and guided writing strategies, alongside improved resource provision, to reduce writing errors and strengthen students’ English proficiency in the Effutu Municipality. Besides, given that female students and those aged 12–15 made more severe errors, the study recommended that teachers provide differentiated support tailored to the needs of these groups. Peer mentoring systems, where stronger students support weaker ones, could also be introduced.

Writing, Errors, Spelling, Capitalization, Agreement, Subject-Verb, Moderate, Effutu Municipality.

1. Alsher, T. (2021). Error analysis of written essays: Do private school students show better EFL writing performance? International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 7(3), 608-629. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1815
2. Amoakohene, B. (2017). Error analysis of students’ essays: A case of first year students of the     University of Health and Allied Sciences. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 22-35.
3. Ancheta, R. F., & Simagala, E. E. (2017). Toward access, learning, and development for all.   International Journal of English Research, 3(2), 63-67.
4. Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). Pearson Education
5. Catabay, M. Q. (2023). Analysis of second language learners’ errors in composition writing: Basis for the proposed English remedial program in higher institution. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(4), e895. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i4.89
6. Connor, U., & Mbaye, A. (2017). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. University of Michigan Press.
7. Corder, S. P. (1974). Error analysis. In J. P. B. Allen & S. P. Corder (Eds.), Techniques in applied linguistics (pp. 122-154). Oxford University Press.
8. Dadzie, G., & Bosiwah, L. (2015). Spelling errors among junior high school students in the Cape Coast Metropolis. Journal of Language, Linguistics and Literature, 1(3), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150403.12
9. Ellis, R. (2010). Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language Teaching, 43(2), 182–201. doi:10.1017/S0261444809990139
10. Erkan, D. Y., & Saban, A. I. (2011). Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in writing, and attitudes towards writing: A correlational study in Turkish tertiary-level EFL. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1), 164-192.
11. Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173290
12. Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
13. Figueredo, L., & Varnhagen, C. K. (2004). Detecting a problem is half the battle: The relation between error type and spelling performance. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(4), 337-356.
14. Fitrawati, & Safitri, D. (2021). Students’ grammatical errors in essay writing: A pedagogical grammar reflection. International Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 74-88.
15. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31(1), 21-32.
16. Graham, S. (2013). Best practices in writing instruction. Guilford Press.
17. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476.
18. Guthrie, J. T., & Coddington, C. S. (2009). Reading motivation. In Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 517-540). Routledge.
19. Hillocks, G. (2011). Teaching argument writing, grades 6–12. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemanri
20. Hussain, M. M., & Hossain, M. A. (2022). Analysing Finnish primary EFL textbooks through a Bangladeshi lens. Teacher’s World. Journal of Education and Research, 48(2), 83-101.
21. Karim, S. M. S., Fathema, F., & Hakim, A. (2015). Common errors on the usage of verbs in English composition: A case study of Bangladeshi EFL learners. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 1-7.
22. Kormos, J. (2016). The second language learning processes of students with specific learning difficulties. Routledge.
23. Kormos, J., & Trebits, A. (2012). The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62(2), 439-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00695.x
24. Kreiner, D. S., Schnakenberg, S. D., Green, R. L., Costello, M. J., & McClin, A. F. (2002). Effects of spelling errors on the perception of writers. Journal of General Psychology, 129(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300209602032
25. Long, M. H. (2014). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783937
26. Martin, W. E., & Acuna, C. (2002). SPSS for institutional researchers. Lewis-Clark State College.
27. McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00042.x
28. McWhorter, K. T. (2019). Successful college writing: Skills, strategies, learning styles (7th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
29. Morgan, D. L. (2019). Commentary—After triangulation, what next? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 6-11.
30. Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090563
31. Owu-Ewie, C., & Williams, R. (2017) Grammatical and Lexical Errors in Students’ English Composition Writing: The Case of Three Senior High Schools (SHS) in the Central Region of Ghana. Sino-US English Teaching, 14(8), 463-482.
32. Pathan, A. (2021). The most frequent capitalization errors made by the EFL learners at undergraduate level: an investigation. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 4(3), 65-72
33. Sasi, S. A & Jiin, L. (2021). Error Analysis of Taiwanese University Students’ English Essay Writing: A Longitudinal Corpus Study. International Journal of Research in English Education, 6, 57-74. 10.52547/ijree.6.4.57.
34. Sasi, S. A & Jiin, L. (2021). Error Analysis of Taiwanese University Students’ English Essay Writing: A Longitudinal Corpus Study. International Journal of Research in English Education, 6, 57-74. 10.52547/ijree.6.4.57. 
35. Skehan, P. (2018). Second language task-based performance: Theory, research, assessment. Routledge
36. Tabiri, F. (2019). An analysis of the writing problems of Ghanaian ESL students: A focus on textual dimension. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(20), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.7176/RHSS/9-20-02
37. Troia, G. A., Shankland, R. K., & Wolbers, K. A. (2006). Writing instruction for students with learning disabilities. Guilford Press.
38. Wang, W., Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2021). The role of role models in academic writing: A qualitative study on the writing needs of ESL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32(2), 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100123
39. Zhan, H. (2015). Frequent Errors in Chinese EFL Learners' Topic-Based Writings. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 72-81.