International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

This study aims to examine the influence of personal traits and Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) on the continued use of sociaal commerce platforms and its consequences for social engagement. Utilizing a quantitative approach, data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed to 90 respondents who have previously engaged in online shopping via social commerce. The analysis employed Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to assess the relationships between variables. The findings reveal that personal traits significantly and positively affect the continued use of social commerce platforms, while FOMO also plays a crucial role in driving user engagement. Moreover, the study concludes that sustained use of these platforms enhances social engagement, indicating that users not only seek transactional benefits but also social interactions. The research highlights the need for social commerce platforms to consider psychological factors when designing user experiences to foster long-term engagement.

Fear of Missing Out, Personal Traits, Social Commerce, Social Engagement

1. X. Zheng, S. Zhu, and Z. Lin, “Capturing the essence of word-of-mouth for social commerce: Assessing the quality of online e-commerce reviews by a semi-supervised approach,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 56, pp. 211–222, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2013.06.002.
2. N. Hajli, “Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 183–191, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005.
3. Y. Chen and S. Chang, “The Effect of Influencer Influence on Recommendation Intention: Focused on TikTok Live Commerce in China,” IJASC, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 15–26, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.22662/IJASC.2021.3.3.015.
4. V. Barger, J. W. Peltier, and D. E. Schultz, “Social media and consumer engagement: a review and research agenda,” J. Res. Interact. Mark., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 268–287, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1108/JRIM-06-2016-0065.
5. J. Li et al., “The Continued Use of Social Commerce Platforms and Psychological Anxiety—The Roles of Influencers, Informational Incentives and FoMO,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 22, p. 12254, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212254.
6. Y. Safitri, A. Luthfia, and S. Ramadanty, “Social Media Influencer Credibility and Social Influence on Intention to Use Fintech in Indonesia,” SSRN Electron. J., 2021, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3800662.
7. H. Alabdullatif and J. Á. Velázquez-Iturbide, “Personality Traits and Intention to Continue Using Massive Open Online Courses (ICM) in Spain: The Mediating Role of Motivations,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 36, no. 20, pp. 1953–1967, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1805873.
8. J. Davis, “Social Media and Experiential Ambivalence,” Futur. Internet, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 955–970, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.3390/fi4040955.
9. A. K. Przybylski, K. Murayama, C. R. DeHaan, and V. Gladwell, “Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1841–1848, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014.
10. E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1985. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7.
11. O. Nov and C. Ye, “Personality and Technology Acceptance: Personal Innovativeness in IT, Openness and Resistance to Change,” in Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), Jan. 2008, pp. 448–448. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.348.
12. V. Özbek, Ü. Alnıaçık, F. Koc, M. E. Akkılıç, and E. Kaş, “The Impact of Personality on Technology Acceptance: A Study on Smart Phone Users,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 150, pp. 541–551, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.073.
13. D. Alt, “College students’ academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 49, pp. 111–119, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.057.
14. N. Vaidya, S. Jaiganesh, and J. Krishnan, “Prevalence of Internet addiction and its impact on the physiological balance of mental health,” Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 97, 2016, doi: 10.5455/njppp.2015.5.0511201588.
15. J. Billieux, P. Maurage, O. Lopez-Fernandez, D. J. Kuss, and M. D. Griffiths, “Can Disordered Mobile Phone Use Be Considered a Behavioral Addiction? An Update on Current Evidence and a Comprehensive Model for Future Research,” Curr. Addict. Reports, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 156–162, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y.
16. F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 319, Sep. 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
17. M. N. ALraja, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: A Field Study of an E-Mail System Adoption from the Individual Students’ Perspective,” Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci., Nov. 2015, doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s1p19.
18. P. Pu, L. Chen, and R. Hu, “A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems,” in Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, Oct. 2011, pp. 157–164. doi: 10.1145/2043932.2043962.
19. Y. J. Joo, H. W. Lee, and Y. Ham, “Integrating user interface and personal innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University,” J. Comput. High. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 143–158, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s12528-014-9081-2.
20. N. B. Hamutoglu, M. Topal, and D. M. Gezgin, “Investigating Direct and Indirect Effects of Social Media Addiction, Social Media Usage and Personality Traits on FOMO,” Int. J. Progress. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 248–261, 2020, doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.17.