Diversifying Foreign Language Teaching Activities Through the Application of Multiple Intelligences Theory

Author's Information:

Hong Thu Thi Nguyen

Hanoi Law University

Vol 02 No 12 (2025):Volume 02 Issue 12 December 2025

Page No.: 1041-1046

Abstract:

The purpose of this article is to examine foreign language teaching activities for foreign language proficiency using Howard Multiple Intelligences Theory, specifically in the context of language instruction. The study intends to elucidate the fundamental ideas of the Multiple Intelligences Theory (MIT), its application in education, and strategies for using it in English language instruction. These strategies include instructional strategies and lecture activities that are tailored to the intellectual traits of individual students. To improve the effectiveness of teaching and learning specialized English, teachers must modify their pedagogical approaches and strategies for structuring various activities to foster the intellectual variety of their students.

KeyWords:

Multiple Intelligences Theory, Intelligence, Howard Gardner, Legal English

References:

  1. Akbari, R., & Hosseini, K. (2008). Multiple intelligences and language learning strategies: Investigating possible relations. System, 36(2). 141–155. doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.008. 
  2. Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligence in the classroom (3rd Ed.). ASCD. 
  3. Arnold, J., & Fonseca, C. (2004). Multiple intelligence theory and foreign language  learning: A brain-based perspective. International Journal of English Studies, 4. 119-136.
  4. Campbell, L., Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D. (2003). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences (3rd Ed.). Pearson Education Inc. 
  5. Christison, M. A., & Bassano, S. (2005). Multiple intelligences and language learning: A guidebook of theory, activities, inventories, and resources. Alta Book Center Publishers. 
  6. Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., and Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Front. Psychol. 3:429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429 
  7. Deligiannidi, K., and Howard-Jones, P. (2015). The neuroscience literacy of teachers in Greece. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 174, 3909–3915. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1133 
  8. Dolati, Z., & Tahriri, A. (2017). EFL teachers’ multiple intelligences and their  classroom practice. SAGE Open, 7(3). SAGE Publications. doi.org/10.1177/2158244017722582.
  9. Dörnyei, Z. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA review, 19(1), 42-68. 
  10. Ferrero, M., Garaizar, P., and Vadillo, M. A. (2016). Neuromyths in education: prevalence among Spanish teachers and an exploration of cross-cultural variation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:496. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00496
  11. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of Multiple intelligences. Basic Books. 
  12. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of Multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). Basic Books.
  13. Gardner, H. (2011b). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. 
  14. Ghamrawi, 2014). Ghamrawi, N. (2014). Multiple intelligences and ESL teaching and learning: An investigation in KG II classrooms in one private school in Beirut, Lebanon. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(1). 25–46. doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13513021 
  15. Jones, E. (2017) One size fits all? Multiple intelligences and legal education, The Law Teacher, 51(1), 56-68.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2015.1082238
  16. Lana, C.(2002). Implementing Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles in Distributed Learning\MS projects. The Education Coalision(TEC).
  17. McKenzie, W. (2005). Multiple intelligences and instructional technology (2nd Ed). International Society for Technology in Education. 
  18. Papadatou-Pastou, M., Haliou, E., and Vlachos, F. (2017). Brain knowledge and the prevalence of neuromyths among prospective teachers in Greece. Front. Psychol. 8:804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804 
  19. Pawlak, M. (2019). How teachers deal with individual differences in the language classroom: results of a study. Neofilologs, 52(1), 179-195. 
  20. Razmajoo, S.A. (2008).On the Relationship between Multiple Intelligences and Language Proficiency. The Reading Matrix. 8(2)
  21. Ramos,Rosalba (2007). Incorporating the Multiple Intelligences Theory in Language Teaching: Portfolios,Projects and team teaching. Lenguaje,35(2),221-240                        
  22. Rato, J. R., Abreu, A. M., and Castro-Caldas, A. (2013). Neuromyths in education: what is fact and what is fiction for Portuguese teachers? Educ. Res. 55, 441–453. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2013.844947 
  23. Sabiq, A. H. A. (2023). Investigating individual differences, school locality, and management on Indonesian students’ attitudes and motivation in EFL learning. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 726-752.
  24. Strauss, V. (2013, October 16). Howard Gardner: ‘Multiple intelligences’ are not ‘learning styles’. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ news/answer-sheet/wp/2013/10/16/howard-gardner-multiple-intelligences-are -not-learning-styles/ 
  25. Xie, j.  and Lin,R. (2009). Research on Multiple Intelligences Teaching and Assessment. Asin Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences. 4(23) ,106-124
  26. Wallace, R. (2010). The perceptions of community college students to foreign language acquisition grounded in Multiple Intelligence theory. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  27. Willingham,D.,T. (2004). Reframing the Mind:Howard Gardner became a  hero among educators simply by redefining talents as" intelligences". www.educationnext.org