International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

The development of digital technology has brought fundamental changes to the practice of the legal profession, particularly in the management and protection of client information. This transformation poses serious challenges to the principle of attorney-client privilege, which has long been the foundation of the relationship of trust between attorneys and clients. On the one hand, positive law and professional ethics in Indonesia explicitly require attorneys to maintain client confidentiality. On the other hand, the digitization of legal practice—through the use of electronic storage, online communication, and smart legal technology-expands the risk of data breaches that are not fully accommodated within the current framework of professional ethics. This situation highlights a normative gap between the attorney-client privilege and the dynamics of digital data protection. This study aims to analyze the concept of attorney-client confidentiality from the perspectives of legal professional ethics and personal data protection law, as well as to formulate the need for a reformulation of attorney confidentiality ethics that is adaptive to the digital era. This study employs a normative legal research method using legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. Legal materials were obtained through a literature review of legislation, professional codes of ethics, scholarly literature, and the practice of regulating lawyer’s professional ethics in several other jurisdictions. The analysis was conducted qualitatively using systematic and prescriptive legal reasoning. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of attorney confidentiality in Indonesia remains oriented toward conventional legal practices and has not explicitly addressed attorney’s digital responsibilities in protecting client data. The absence of clear regulations regarding technological competence and data security has the potential to weaken client confidentiality protections and create normative uncertainty for attorneys. This study emphasizes that attorneys’ confidentiality obligations in the digital age must be understood as multidimensional obligations encompassing ethical, legal, and technological aspects. A reformulation of the legal profession’s ethics must integrate the principles of digital confidentiality, technological competence, and data accountability to align with personal data protection regimes and developments in legal technology. With these updates, the legal profession is expected to maintain its integrity and public trust amidst the digital transformation of legal practice.

lawyers, professional confidentiality, legal professional ethics, personal data protection, digitization of legal practice.

1. Abella, P., Dayu, N., & Marzadi, H. (2025). Analisis pelanggaran kode etik advokat dan perannya dalam meningkatkan profesionalisme profesi advokat. Journal of Development Economics and Digitalization, Tourism Economics, 2(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.70248/jdedte.v2i1.1754
2. Adams, T. L., Leslie, K., Myles, S., & Moraes, B. (2024). Regulating professional ethics in a context of technological change. BMC Medical Ethics, 25(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01140-x
3. Adela, N. N., Maharani, T. S., Rahmadina, N. S., Kurdi, S., Wardani, M., & Hafidzi, A. (2025). Hak privasi pengguna dalam era kecerdasan buatan: Tinjauan normatif hukum terhadap kesehatan mental. Interdisciplinary Explorations in Research Journal, 3(1), 75–82.
4. Anam, M. A., Mubarok, M. B. U., Fitria, A. S., Lailiyah, R. A., & Wahidullah. (2025). Etika profesi hukum dalam menghadapi tantangan era digital melalui perspektif integritas, tanggung jawab, dan independensi profesi. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 2715–2726. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1707
5. Asrori, M. N. (2018). Tanggung jawab advokat dalam menjalankan jasa hukum kepada klien. Deepublish.
6. Azahra, M. F., & Putra, P. (2024). Implementasi arsip digital dalam efisiensi penyimpanan. Journal of Economic and Management (JEM) Terekam Jejak, 1(1), 1–13.
7. Bayya, A. K. (2022). Advocating ethical data management and security. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering Techniques, 8, 396–417. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT225541
8. Butar-Butar, B. N., & Esther, J. (2026). Perlindungan hak asasi manusia dalam proses peradilan pidana melalui peran advokat. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial, 4(4), 609–620. https://doi.org/10.58540/jipsi.v4i4.1107
9. Candra, G. A. E. (2025). Peran teknologi informasi dalam meningkatkan pemberian bantuan hukum kepada klien oleh advokat dalam perkara perdata. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 11(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v11i1.102229
10. Cervi, G. V. (2022). Why and how does the EU rule global digital policy: An empirical analysis of EU regulatory influence in data protection laws. Digital Society, 1(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00005-3
11. Cindy, C., Ivanka, K. A., Nasution, N. A., & Nurbaiti, N. (2025). Penerapan teknologi blockchain untuk meningkatkan keamanan dalam transaksi di era digital. Economist: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.63545/economist.v2i1.79
12. Cox, A. (2022). The ethics of AI for information professionals: Eight scenarios. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 71(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2022.2084885
13. Davidson, K. M., Ostrom, B. J., & Kleiman, M. (2022). Client perspectives of holistic defense: Strengthening procedural justice through enhanced client trust. Justice System Journal, 43(1), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2022.2062582
14. Dewanti, T. R., & Lewoleba, K. K. (2025). Analisis pelanggaran kode etik advokat terhadap penanganan perkara klien dalam kasus advokat Biy Palembang. Media Hukum Indonesia, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15637950
15. Fauziah, Y. A., Susanto, D. A., & Utama, Y. P. (2026). Perlindungan hukum data kesehatan pasien di era digital. Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan, 6(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.30649/jhek.v6i1.270
16. Fiona, & Rizqiyah, N. (2025). Perlindungan data pribadi klien pada era digital: Harmonisasi regulasi kenotariatan dan hukum perlindungan data pribadi. Jurnal Minuta, 7(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.24123/minuta.v7i2.7635
17. Fisher, M. A. (2008). Protecting confidentiality rights: The need for an ethical practice model. American Psychologist, 63(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.1.1
18. He, Z. (2023). From privacy-enhancing to health data utilisation: The traces of anonymisation and pseudonymisation in EU data protection law. Digital Society, 2(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00043-5
19. Implementasi kode etik profesi advokat dalam praktik sehari-hari. (n.d.). Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/799
20. Jorgenson, L. M., Hirsch, A. B., & Wahl, K. M. (1997). Fiduciary duty and boundaries: Acting in the client’s best interest. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 15(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199724)15:1<49::AID-BSL253>3.0.CO;2-X
21. Khairun, I. L. L., Ardelia, T. A., Aprilia, S. N., & Imon, S. A. (2025). Strategi komunikasi advokat dalam membangun kepercayaan klien: Ditinjau dari pendekatan hukum. Media Hukum Indonesia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15511861
22. Khan, M. N. I. (2023). Legal documentation and case management: A systematic review of digitization trends and cybersecurity challenges in legal support roles. Review of Applied Science and Technology, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.63125/21hf4w52
23. Kurniawan, T., Dj, A., Karim, A., Marifah, M., & Muniri, S. (2025). E-book hukum digital dan privasi data 2025.
24. Lubis, F., Harahap, N. I., Livia, D., Sembiring, T. H., Lubis, M. A., & Sitepu, A. R. (2025). Peran advokat dalam menegakkan keadilan. Bertuah Jurnal Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam, 6(1), 104–113.
25. Manullang, R. L., & Habeahan, B. (2026). Tinjauan yuridis peranan advokat dalam penyelesaian sengketa yang ditentukan oleh klien. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(6), 2054–2063. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i06.2070
26. McCarty, D. L., Christian, D. D., & Stefurak, T. (2023). Adlerian-informed supervision: Protecting counselors from burnout and improving client outcomes in the juvenile justice system. Psychological Services, 20(2), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000641
27. Meliana, Y. (2025). Dialektika sistem peradilan terhadap analisis kritis perbandingan litigasi virtual dan konvensional dalam perspektif hak pembelaan terdakwa. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.2183
28. M. Hum, S. (2023). Etika dan tanggung jawab profesi hukum di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
29. Muhamad, F., Basyarin, R., & Akhirah, N. (2025). Peran strategis profesi hukum di era society 5.0: Antara inovasi dan etika profesional. Journal Sains Student Research, 3(2), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v3i2.4391
30. Munawarah, I., Raffi, M., Agustin, N., & Haslinda, H. (2025). Menjaga privasi di cloud: Tantangan dan strategi perlindungan data pribadi di era digital. Prosiding Diseminasi Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/dinamika.v2i1.8341
31. Nasution, S. A., & Husein, S. H. (2025). Pengaruh teknologi informasi terhadap kewajiban kerahasiaan dan perlindungan data pribadi klien dalam praktik notaris. Media Bina Ilmiah, 19(12), 6491–6500.
32. Permana, G. (2024). Urgensi perubahan pengaturan kelembagaan organisasi advokat untuk mewujudkan profesi advokat yang officium nobile (Master’s thesis, Universitas Nasional). https://repository.unas.ac.id/id/eprint/10944/
33. Pratomo, M. A. (2025). Profesional di bawah sorotan algoritma: Etika, citra, dan pertarungan di era digital. PT MuhammadAriLaw Pustaka Nada.
34. Putri, R. M. S., Septiani, R., Putri, N. A. C., & Handoko, A. B. (2026). Etika profesi sebagai pilar pencegahan penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam penegakan hukum pidana. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, 4(2). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/1039
35. Rabiu, A. A., Merican, A. M. M. N., & Murshid, G. A. (2025). Ethics in the digital age: Exploring the ethical challenges of technology. Journal of Information Systems and Digital Technologies, 7(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.31436/jisdt.v7i1.555
36. Rafid, R., & Nurita, R. F. (2025). Dinamika pendidikan dan hukum di era digital: Tantangan dan peluang dalam menghadapi transformasi teknologi. MLJ Merdeka Law Journal, 6(1), 79–92.
37. Rauzi, F., & Suriadiata, I. (2024). Penyuluhan etika profesi hukum bagi calon advokat Ikatan Advokat Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian dan Inovasi, 2(4), 869–876. https://doi.org/10.57248/jilpi.v2i4.429
38. Rhode, D. L. (2003). Ethics in practice: Lawyers’ roles, responsibilities, and regulation. Oxford University Press.
39. Rinaldi, F. A., Hidayati, A. D., Putri, L. N. A., Ramadhani, R., Abigail, K. J., Sumardiana, B., & Abidah, S. Q. (2025). Kemahiran bantuan hukum pendampingan advokat berkomunikasi dengan klien. Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research, 2(2), 3678–3687. https://doi.org/10.32672/mister.v2i2.3223
40. Rosdiana, R., Arda, A., & Yanti, D. (2025). Legal issues in the oversight and enforcement of advocate professional ethics in Indonesia. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial, 3(1), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v3i1.2300
41. Saputra, M. I., Nugeraha, P. R., Maulana, M. R., & Pratama, M. R. (2026). Orientasi materi versus integritas profesi advokat: Tantangan penegakan kode etik dalam praktik hukum. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, 4(2). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/1059
42. Setiarma, A. (2023). Disrupsi teknologi hukum terhadap jasa advokat dalam pandangan hukum pembangunan Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. Reformasi Hukum, 27(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v27i2.622
43. Siregar, M. A. (2025). Buku ajar perbandingan hukum pidana. Serasi Media Teknologi.
44. Tahir, R., Astawa, I. G. P., Widjajanto, A., Panggabean, M. L., Rohman, M. M., Dewi, N. P. P., Deliarnoor, N. A., Abas, M., Ayu, R. F., Meinarni, N. P. S., Hs, F., Sumartini, N. W. E., Sugiharti, D. K., & Paminto, S. R. (2023). Metodologi penelitian bidang hukum: Suatu pendekatan teori dan praktik. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
45. Trust, because you can’t verify: Privacy and security hurdles in education technology acquisition practices. (n.d.). Proceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/3658644.3690353
46. Waruwu, S., & Siswoyo, A. A. (2024). Data pribadi sebagai aset bisnis: Sinergi hukum rahasia dagang dan perlindungan data. Lex Lectio Law Journal, 3(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.61715/jll.v3i2.118
47. Zuhdiantito, A. (2025). Urgensi pembaharuan hukum terhadap undang-undang jabatan notaris berbasis praktik persaingan tidak sehat antar notaris di era disrupsi digital (Thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/57822