International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

This research examined the role of cover teaching in contemporary secondary education in the United Kingdom and explored who cover supervisors are and what they are employed to do as well as investigated and highlighted the accounts that cover supervisors provide of what they do. Cover supervision occurs when no active teaching is taking place and involves the supervision of pre-set learning activities. According to the United Kingdom Teacher’s Union, cover teachers are drafted in because of the unavailability of teachers that will supervise the work that has been set in accordance with the school policy; manage the behaviour of pupils while they are undertaking this work to ensure a constructive environment; respond to any questions from pupils about process and procedures, etc. However, in spite of the well stated roles, regulations and responsibilities expected from cover teachers, it is worrisome that nobody really monitors what they do and possibly, no one even cares. This while, worrisome is coupled with the issue of scarcity of researches in this area in the UK. This study was conducted to answer the following research questions, ‘What are cover supervisors and what are they employed to do?; What accounts do cover supervisors provide of what they do?’. Via the exploration of the cover journals, views and reasoning, the mixed-method approach utilised focused on the writer of the research and one other cover teacher in an ethnography form as well as some other teachers and school administrators. The double-edge findings due to the mixed analysis showed different unfavourable behaviors shown by students, including the disengagement, nonparticipation of the students to the discussion, distractions etc. It also highlighted themes from the qualitative analysis. This study provides a strong basis on which other researchers will build, because studies in the past have not really elaborated on the activities of cover supervision and this is especially true in the UK. The study advised for a targeted interventions to tackle negative behaviours, to establish a dedicated and extensively trained corps of cover teachers and leverage technology and remote teaching to reduce the need for in-person cover supervision.

Cover, Substitute, Cover Teacher, Supervision

1. Arewa, O.O. and Fehintola, V.A., 2024. Social support, locus of control and gender as determinants of retirement satisfaction among secondary school retired teachers in Oyo town, Nigeria. African Journal for the Psychological Studies of Social Issues, 27(3).
2. Barlin, D. and Hallgarten, J., 2001. Supply Teachers: Symptom of the Problem Or Part of the Solution?.Institute for Public Policy Research.
3. Barnes, L.S., 2022. No Substitution for Substitute Teaching Experiences: A Case Study Exploring Perspectives of New Substitute Teachers (Doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University).
4. BERA. (2018). British Educational Research Associations’ ethical guidelines for educational research. Retrieved 4 April 2024 from https://www.bera.ac.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2018/06/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-for-Educational.
5. Brinkmann, S. and Kvale, S., 2015. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage publications.
6. Britton, J. and Propper, C., 2016. Teacher pay and school productivity: Exploiting wage regulation. Journal of Public Economics, 133, pp.75-89.
7. Fehintola, V.A., Okpako, E.O. and Fehintola, H.A., 2021. Psychological and job contextual predictors of work commitment among the polytechnic ibadan staffs, Nigeria. NIU Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), pp.93-101.
8. Hayman, B., Wilkes, L. and Jackson, D., 2012. Journaling: Identification of challenges and reflection on strategies. Nurse researcher, 19(3).
9. Hennink, M., Hutter I., Bailey A. 2011. Qualitative Research Methods.Sage Publications, London.
10. Koedel, C., Mihaly, K., & Rockoff, J. E. 2015. Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review, 47, 180-195.
11. Konecki, M., 2020, September. Impact of distance learning on motivation and success rate of students during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO) (pp. 813-817). IEEE
12. Peim, N., 2018. Thinking in education research: Applying philosophy and theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
13. Perry, S.B., Rogers, M.P. and Kitts, K., 2022. A field experience without the field: A reflective self-study of teaching an elementary science field experience online during a pandemic. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(2), pp.528-548.
14. Perryman, J. and Calvert, G., 2020. What motivates people to teach, and why do they leave? Accountability, performativity and teacher retention. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(1), pp.3-23.
15. Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I.S., 2011. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. sage.
16. Rabionet, S.E., 2011. How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews: an ongoing and continuous journey. Qualitative report, 16(2), pp.563-566.
17. Reupert, A., Sullivan, A., Tippett, N., White, S., Woodcock, S., Chen, L. and Simons, M., 2023. An exploration of the experiences of substitute teachers: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 93(6), pp.901-941.
18. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2009. Research methods for business students. Pearson education.
19. Saxena, A., Hood, L., Manogharan, G. and Berdanier, C., 2022, October. Characterizing the Training and Evaluation of Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) at Research-Intensive Universities: Highlighting Best Practices and Opportunities for Reform. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Vol. 86694, p. V007T09A005). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
20. Scalzo, J., 2014. Making my time count: Attempting global education as a substitute teacher in the K-12 classroom. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 9(1).
21. Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., Buchanan, J., Russell, T., Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., Buchanan, J. and Russell, T., 2012. Teaching Here and There: Substitute Teaching. Beginning Teaching: Stories from the Classroom, pp.91-103.
22. Worth, J. and Faulkner-Ellis, H., 2021. Teacher Labour Market in England: Annual Report 2021. National Foundation for Educational Research.
23. Wyld, D.C., 1995. The FMLA and the changing demand for substitute teachers. The Clearing House, 68(5), pp.301-306.
24. Zain, A.M., Asimiran, S., Razali, A.B. and Ahmad, N.A., 2021. Coaching and Mentoring as a Teaching Supervision Approach in Secondary School. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 11(4S), pp.98110-98110.
25. Zhang Wen-yan (2013). A Research on the Difficulties for Substitute Teachers in Urban Areas. Central China Normal University Journal of Postgraduates.
26. Zhu, L., 2023. A Study on the Turnover Intention of Substitute Teachers in H School from the Perspective of Psychological Contract. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 2(1), pp.119-121.
27. Zottmann, J.M., Horrer, A., Chouchane, A., Huber, J., Heuser, S., Iwaki, L., Kowalski, C., Gartmeier, M., Berberat, P.O., Fischer, M.R. and Weidenbusch, M., 2020. Isn’t here just there without a “t”–to what extent can digital Clinical Case Discussions compensate for the absence of face-to-face teaching?. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 37(7).
28. Zubrzycki, J., 2017. The teacher crisis in rural Colorado.