International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies

This study evaluates the Perceived Effect of IPSAS Adoption on Ethical Behavior in Public Financial Management of the North-Eastern States of Nigeria. It explores the impact of adopting International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) on ethical behavior and financial management practices. Through a mixed-method approach, data was collected using questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings indicate a generally positive perception of IPSAS adoption across demographic groups, with variations in perception based on factors such as age, education level, and years of experience. ANOVA results reveal significant differences in perceived adoption, ethical behavior, financial management, perceived IPSAS management, and implementation benefits among the North-Eastern states. The correlation matrix shows strong positive correlations between perceived adoption, ethical behavior, and implementation benefits, highlighting the potential benefits of IPSAS adoption. The study suggests that efforts to enhance IPSAS adoption and improve financial management practices could positively impact ethical behavior and implementation benefits in the region. Further research and targeted interventions are recommended to address specific challenges and maximize the benefits of IPSAS adoption in North-Eastern Nigeria.

Methodology: The study employed a primary research approach using a questionnaire to collect data on perceived adoption, ethical behavior, financial management, perceived IPSAS management, and implementation benefits. A multi-stage sampling method was used to select respondents from the North-Eastern states of Nigeria. Data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics, including ANOVA and correlation analysis, conducted using the Statistical Program for Social Science (SPSS).

Adoption, IPSAS, Public Finance and Management

1. Acho, Y. (2014). The challenges of adopting IPSAS in Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences and Public Policy, 6(2), 29-39.
2. Adam, B., Mussari, R., & Jones, R. (2011). The diversity of accrual policies in local government financial reporting: An examination of infrastructure, art and heritage assets in Germany, Italy and the UK. Financial Accountability & Management, 27, 107–133.
3. Adegite, E. O. (2010). Accounting, accountability and national development. Nigerian Accountant, 43(1), 56-64.
4. Ijeoma, N. B. (2014). The impact of IPSAS on reliability, credibility and integrity of financial reporting in state government administration in Nigeria. International Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research, 2(3).
5. Ademola, A. O., Adegoke, O. K., & Oyeleye, O. A. (2017). Impact of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) Adoption on Financial Accountability in Selected Local Governments of Oyo State Nigeria. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 3(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEBA/2017/33866
6. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2020). Lecturer in Accounting at the University of Salamanca, Spain, where she earned her PhD in Business Economics. Beatriz Cuadrado-Ballesteroshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-2302
7. Bello, A. (2013). IPSAS: Issues, Challenges and Implementation. Paper presented at MCPD organized by Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Nigeria (ICPAN).
8. Bello, S. (2001). Fraud prevention and control in Nigerian public service: The need for a dimensional approach. Journal of Business Administration, 1(2), 118-133.
9. Benito, B., Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2007). The harmonization of government financial information systems: The role of the IPSASs. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 293–317.
10. Brusca, I., & Condor, V. (2002). Towards the harmonisation of local accounting systems in the international context. Financial Accountability & Management, 18(2), 129–162.
11. Chan, Y. H. (2003). Biostatistics 102: Quantitative Data – Parametric & Non-parametric Tests. Singapore Medical Journal, 44(8), 391-396.
12. Chen, M. C. (2012). The influence of workplace spirituality on motivations for earnings management: A study in Taiwan's hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality Management and Tourism, 3(1), 1-11.
13. Christiaens, J., Reyniers, B., & Rollé, C. (2010). Impact of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial information systems: A comparative study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76, 537-554.
14. Heald, D. (2003). The global revolution in government accounting. Symposium in Public Money & Management, 23(1).
15. IASB. (2008). Exposure draft on an improved conceptual framework for financial reporting: The objective of financial reporting and qualitative characteristics of decision-useful financial reporting information. London.
16. IASB. The Conceptual Framework. http://eifrs.iasb.org/eifrs/bnstandards/en/framework.pdf
17. IFAC. (2012). Policy Position Public Sector Financial Management Transparency & Accountability, Institute of Internal Auditors. Responsibilities Auditors.
18. Ijeoma, N. B., & Oghoghomeh, T. (2014). Adoption of International Public Sector Accounting Standards In Nigeria: Expectations, benefits and challenges. Journal of Investment and Management, 3(1), 21-29.
19. International Federation of Accountants. (2001). Governance in the public sector: A governing body perspective. International Public Sector Study.
20. International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) Board. (2008). Handbook of International Public Sector Accounting Pronouncements. New York: IFAC.
21. International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2015). IPSASB FACTSHEET. Retrieved from http://www.ifac.org
22. International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board. (2012). Conceptual Framework Exposure Draft 1. Conceptual Framework for General Purpose Financial Reporting by Public Sector Entities. New York, USA.
23. Jenkins, A., Healey, M., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking Research and Teaching in Disciplines and Departments. York: HE Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/teachingandresearch/LinkingTeachingAndResearch_April07.pdf
24. Kara, E. (2012). Financial analysis in public sector Accounting. An Example of EU, Greece and Turkey. European Journal of Scientific Research, 69(1), 81–89.
25. Khan, A., Seiwald, J., & Schaik, F. V. (2014). IPSAS in Iceland: Towards enhanced fiscal transparency. International Monetary Fund, Publication Services PO Box 92780, Washington, D.C. 20090.
26. Kopits, G. (1991). Fiscal Reform in European Economies in Transition. In S. Zecchini & P. Marer (Eds.), The Transition to a Market Economy, Vol. 2, (pp. 359–388). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
27. Ohaka, J., Dagogo, D. W., & Lenakpe-Op, B. J. (2016). International Public sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) and local government financial management in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 2(3).
28. Onochie, V. O. (2006). Enhancing Financial Accountability in Government Parastatals: A Necessity for National Development. The Nigerian Accountant, Journal of the Institute of Chartered Accountant of Nigeria, July/September, 2006, Vol. 39(3), 22-29.
29. Otunla, J. O. (2014). The Implementation of The International Public Sector Accounting Standards In Nigeria: The Journey so Far. Presentation at the Annual Accountants’ Conference of ICAN.
30. Ozugbo, M. J. (2009). Financial Reporting for Good Governance in Public Sector Entities in Nedaw. Public Sector Accounting. Bahir Dar: Nakura Publication.
31. Udeh, F., & Sopekan, S. (2015). Adoption of IPSAS and the Quality of Public Sector Financial Reporting in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(20).
32. Wikipedia. (2014). International public sector accounting standards. http://www.wikipedia.org
33. World Health Organization. (2013). IPSAS Benefits to WHO. WHO document production Geneva, Switzerland.
34. Yohou, H. D. (2019). De facto Tax reform index and development in developing countries. Forthcoming.